Table 4.ConDem (long-term sickness) MODELS SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS FOLLOWS Main(1): model 6 from Table 15 Linear: continuous linear forms of demands and control NoStr: categorical demands-control, no interaction term Lin_NoStr: continuous linear demands-control without interaction term Just con: Categorical control without demands Just dem: categorical demands without control Hi+Lo Str: no terms for demands-control separately, just dummies for 'high-strain', 'low-strain' and 'other' Main(1) Linear NoStr Lin_NoStr Just Con Just Str Hi+Lo Str ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FltsickB Low control (base) 1.00 1.00 1.00 [.] [.] [.] Moderate control 1.10 0.90 0.90 [0.81] [0.76] [0.76] High control 1.04 0.84 0.84 [0.93] [0.67] [0.67] Low demands (base) 1.00 1.00 [.] [.] Moderate demands 1.13 1.12 [0.71] [0.72] High demands 0.72 1.00 [0.48] [0.99] High-strain 1.93 1.36 1.34 [0.26] [0.41] [0.43] Demands (stdized) 1.08 1.08 [0.59] [0.56] Control (stdized) 0.91 0.91 [0.51] [0.51] Demands-control interaction 1.00 [0.97] lostrainT 0.86 [0.80] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N 8935 8935 8935 8935 8935 8935 8935 pseudo R-sq 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Num persons 6260 6260 6260 6260 6260 6260 6260 dropped Parameters 39 37 38 36 36 35 36 _ incidence 0.705 0.705 0.705 0.705 0.705 _ *** High-strain vs. Low-strain*** Baseline (high-strain) 0.894 0.810 0.727 0.812 0.682 Effect of high vs low-strain 0.217 0.236 0.109 0.234 0.220 0.303 se 0.368 0.268 0.321 0.263 0.295 0.423 p 0.555 0.380 0.734 0.373 0.456 0.474 _ *** High-strain vs. Other jobs*** Effect of high vs other jobs 0.214 se 0.297 p 0.472 *** High-strain vs. Active*** Baseline (high-strain, as before) Effect of high-strain vs active 0.393 0.132 0.106 0.138 0.110 se 0.377 0.265 0.242 0.207 0.248 p 0.297 0.619 0.661 0.504 0.659 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Exponentiated coefficients; p-values in brackets Results exported 21 Jun 2011 using datafile version WIIv1-41.dta Subsample was FagegrpR<5 & employ==1 + p<0.10, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001